Resource Radar← Back to demo
Product decisionsResource Radar

Product decisions

Decision Alternatives considered Chosen approach and cost Reversal criterion
Express capacity in person-days Percent allocation; weekly label Show capacity, time off, commitments, and allocations in days. It does not remove estimation uncertainty. More than one formative participant cannot translate a real planning input into the displayed day model.
Surface initiative risk from a person-week conflict Portfolio score; automatic staffing recommendation Link affected allocations to an at-risk initiative without deciding who moves work. Participants repeatedly read the signal as a delivery forecast after the explanation is revised.
Separate draft from applied baseline Immediate-save editing; untracked scratchpad Keep edits reversible until Apply draft. The comparison adds a review step. Participants cannot identify which state is current or believe a draft silently changed the plan.
Keep local export Shared workspace; HRIS connection Persist in the browser and offer JSON. This limits collaboration. A specific handoff need, provenance model, and data boundary are evidenced before a shared proposal.

These are product choices for a fictional portfolio sample, not evidence of user preference or a shipped outcome.