Product decisions
| Decision | Alternatives considered | Chosen approach and cost | Reversal criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Express capacity in person-days | Percent allocation; weekly label | Show capacity, time off, commitments, and allocations in days. It does not remove estimation uncertainty. | More than one formative participant cannot translate a real planning input into the displayed day model. |
| Surface initiative risk from a person-week conflict | Portfolio score; automatic staffing recommendation | Link affected allocations to an at-risk initiative without deciding who moves work. | Participants repeatedly read the signal as a delivery forecast after the explanation is revised. |
| Separate draft from applied baseline | Immediate-save editing; untracked scratchpad | Keep edits reversible until Apply draft. The comparison adds a review step. | Participants cannot identify which state is current or believe a draft silently changed the plan. |
| Keep local export | Shared workspace; HRIS connection | Persist in the browser and offer JSON. This limits collaboration. | A specific handoff need, provenance model, and data boundary are evidenced before a shared proposal. |
These are product choices for a fictional portfolio sample, not evidence of user preference or a shipped outcome.